You don’t have to choose between being a person of faith and
a scholar. I see at least three ways that my faith in Christ and my
appreciation of the academic discipline of political science have affected each
other in positive ways.
Peace about my views
The first major effect is a general absence of fear. In my
courses I cover a wide variety of negative things, wars, financial crises,
negative campaigning, etc. A Christian perspective gives me a sense of hope
where a purely objective look at events might not.
This also manifests itself in a more relaxed approach to
political disagreement. In an era in which one hateful thing after another is
written about political opponents, my classroom can be a place where people
don’t have to feel compelled to agree with me about every little thing. I have
a confidence that comes from years of study, but also a faith that puts our
earthly politics into perspective. This means that a student from any political
background, or none at all, can come into my class and explore ideas without
worrying that they’ll negatively impact their grade because they don’t echo my
opinions.
This peace extends itself to many of my other relationships.
Many of my friends don’t share much in common with me politically. It’s
possible that they don’t know what I actually think. Most people don’t ask,
perhaps assuming agreement. Perhaps they overlook my failings. Others might
assume I disagree with them and it simply doesn’t bother them. I have friends
who are, at times, openly contemptuous of faith perspectives. A confident peace
maintains these relationships, too.
My life is much richer because I know people who disagree
with me. Maybe they overlook my faith. Maybe they just assume I’m different.
Hopefully, they see evidence in my life of Christ. Whatever the reason, a sense
of peace builds bridges that I may not otherwise have with those who think,
feel, and pray differently from me. I’m exposed to ideas I would never
otherwise hear, and have a much richer understanding of how people reach their
political conclusions.
An appreciation of data
William Edwards Deming is quoted as saying, “In God we
trust. All others bring data.” This is such a great place to explore how the
Christian political scientist lives in two worlds. Our discipline insists upon
the most objective measures of hard-to-define concepts as the standard from
which we draw conclusions. These conclusions regularly run counter to
intuition, and often have easily politicized ramifications (climate data,
anyone?).
Jesus called himself the truth. This truth-seeking ethos of
political science is something that we should embrace. I tell my students to
follow the data, seek the truth wherever it leads. The truth they find may make
them uncomfortable as it may challenge their political worldview. It can
isolate you from others who insist that the data’s story conform to a
particular ideology.
An appreciation for data, and the training required to
understand measurement and analysis both require the scholar to accept some
degree of uncertainty and measurement error. For the political ideologue, however,
certainty reigns. Political science generally argues that our most
sophisticated conclusions are probabilistic, and the best scholars approach
prediction with intellectual humility.
New things to say
The intersection of my personal faith and my academic work
has led me to explore ideas I’d have never considered if I tried to focus on only
one way of thinking. I’m challenged to think about amorphous concepts and
refine how I teach, write, and advise.
The writing that comes out of this doesn’t always neatly fit
in traditional political science research, which usually takes a tone that is
purely empirical, focused on what can be seen and measured. Much of my recent
work is very different from that. Hopefully that connects with people who might
never read a political science journal.
Summing up
The worlds of academic thinking and faith have
positively intersected in my life and work. I think this helps me in both
areas. I don’t worry about how analytic thinking might challenge my beliefs
because I frame both my faith and discipline as places of truth-seeking. This
may lead me to alienate some people, but will open the door to engagement with
some who might otherwise not consider Christianity to be compatible with a more
empirical approach to politics.
One need not have a faith perspective to be a great teacher
who is open to letting students be free to explore their politics, or to be a
person who develops rich relationships with those with whom they disagree. But,
I know that has become easier for me over time as I’ve been more conscious of
my faith. It confuses me when my fellow Christians speak insultingly about
those that disagree with them on politics. I’ve been that person and I hope I’ve
matured since then.
No comments:
Post a Comment